Skip to content

SCotUS makes the right call in AK case

It’s always nice to see appropriate allowances being made for people to celebrate their religious faith, when it doesn’t affect anyone else’s liberty and rights to celebrate their own (or their lack thereof).  As Justice Ginsburg noted:

“Unlike the exemption this Court approved in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., accommodating petitioner’s religious belief in this case would not detrimentally affect others who do not share petitioner’s belief”

Considering that prisons in 40 other states allow for inmates to have beards, and with arguments like “the inmate could smuggle contraband or weapons in his beard” (when there are no laws saying that inmates must shave their heads), it’s surprising the case actually made it as far as it did.

Florida school board learns what “freedom of religion” really means, doesn’t like it

When faced with a lawsuit over their refusal to allow non-Christian groups to distribute material alongside those who were distributing Bibles, a Florida school board finally relented and said others could hand out their books and pamphlets as well.  But when they finally realized what that meant, and that religious groups they didn’t like (including the Satanists) would have similar access to children as their preferred ones, they decided to cancel the event completely.

You have to either allow no groups at all to distribute their materials, or allow all of them: anything else become Constitutionally problematic. But situations like this expose the hypocrisy behind those who claim religious freedom to defend their actions, but then immediately back down when it becomes clear theirs may not be the only religion represented.

Reason magazine: mixing religion and the law is a bad idea

A reasonable article from Reason magazine on why mixing religion with public policy is not the right thing to do:

No, it’s not time to “turn back to God,” especially when it comes to politics and public policy. What ails the government is not a deficit of religiosity but a nearly complete failure to deal with practical issues of spending versus revenue, creating a simple and fair tax system, reforming entitlements, and getting real about the limits of America’s ability to control every corner of the globe. God has nothing to do with any of that. The fault lies not in our stars but in policies.

Gov. Bobby Jindal Says “We have tried everything and now it is time to turn back to God.” No it’s not. – Hit & Run : Reason.com.

Americans United Welcomes Ky. Officials’ Decision Not To Award Public Funding To ‘Ark Park’ | Americans United

The right decision.  The “Ark Park” was not a good use of tax dollars.

Here’s the history: “Answers in Genesis”, the fundamentalist Christian organization behind the “Ark Park”, was asking for millions of dollars in tax breaks and incentives to build their park.

But then, in spite of their claims that the park would be an educational tourist attraction, they made it abundantly clear that it would be nothing more than an extension of their fundamentalist ministry.  AND, they made it clear that the only people who would be employed by the park would be those who agreed with their fundamentalist, young-earth, anti-evolution version of Christianity… by stating that on the job openings.

Guess what?  You can do that. But not while you’re getting public tax money to do so.  So Kentucky will not be granting them the tax incentives.

Want my tax money?  OK.  But thanks to separation of Church and State, you can’t use it to promote or denigrate any religion, and you can’t use it to discriminate against employees because of their religion.  Use your own money, get your own private donors, pay for it yourself, do whatever you want.

The right decision, Kentucky.  Thank you.

via Americans United Welcomes Ky. Officials’ Decision Not To Award Public Funding To ‘Ark Park’ | Americans United.

 

 

AU + Allies Challenge Michigan City’s Rejection Of Atheist Display

It’s a simple lesson that seems difficult for some people to understand: once you open up a public, taxpayer-funded space for the expression of one opinion on religion, you have to open it up for all.  Just as religious groups would complain if an atheist organization were given free space to communicate their ideas inside a government building while rejecting theirs, atheists have the right to use public space that has been provided to religious organizations.  If you allow one viewpoint and one viewpoint only, then you are promoting that viewpoint while suppressing others.  It’s not the role of government to decide whose viewpoint is appropriate to be expressed and which is not.

But Michigan seems to need a reminder:

Since 2009, the city has allowed a local church group to run a prayer station in which volunteers distribute religious pamphlets, offer to pray with passersby, and discuss their religious beliefs with people who approach the station. The lawsuit filed today does not seek to have the prayer station removed, but instead asks the court to order the city to treat believers and non-believers equally.

For those who assume (incorrectly) that Americans United only supports atheistic viewpoints, that last sentence is important: it’s not that non-believers should be treated better or have more rights than believers.  It’s that ALL viewpoints should be treated equally by the government, since the government is representing all of us, regardless of religion or lack thereof.  This helps protect ALL religious views and forms of expression.

AU Action Alert: Senate Bill S. 2578

Today, the Senate will vote on the “Not My Boss’ Business Act.” It’s an important first step to fixing the damage the Supreme Court caused in Hobby Lobby–and here’s how you can take action.

Click here!

World War II Memorial Prayer Act Vote

On June 23, the House of Representatives passed S. 1044, “The World War II Memorial Prayer Act of 2013,” which calls for the installation of a plaque or inscription with a prayer at the World War II Memorial in Washington DC.

One of the main themes of the World War II Memorial is unity. Adding a prayer to the memorial, however, introduces something about which many Americans disagree: religion. America’s military, like the nation itself, is extraordinarily religiously diverse. Our veterans, like our currently serving troops, come from many different religious traditions and some follow no spiritual path at all. Adding a prayer that represents some—but not all—veterans and members of the military defies the theme of unity and leaves many unrepresented.

Keeping a separation of church and state in this case would better serve religious freedom and truly represent and honor all veterans. There was no need to take extraordinary steps to reopen the design of the memorial 10 years after its dedication to add a prayer, especially when the monument already acknowledges that faith was important to many soldiers during the war.

The 12 Representatives who took a stand against this bill deserve to be thanked, so this is your chance to thank them. Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison was one of only twelve representatives to vote against it and we’d like to encourage people to thank him for his vote. If you have members or friends who may live in his district, please consider forwarding the alert to them if you haven’t already. And, if your Representative voted for the prayer to be added to the memorial, please remind him or her that the government should honor the principle of church-state separation in order to best honor all of our veterans.

To find out how your Representative voted and to send him or her a follow-up message, enter your info at this site!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 691 other followers